Residents' Survey 2026: results

Pages in Residents' Survey 2026: results

  1. 1. You are here: Residents' Survey 2026: results
  2. 2. Residents' Survey 2026: visual report

The annual Residents’ Survey measures how satisfied residents are with life in the borough and the services provided by Reigate & Banstead Borough Council. The findings help us to understand how we are delivering against our Corporate Plan and compare our performance across years; but more importantly they help us improve our understanding of the residents’ views and allow us to design services that meet their needs.

The survey was conducted over four weeks at the beginning of 2026. The survey followed industry standard (Local Government Association) Resident Survey questions and covered key themes including: 

  • Satisfaction with life in the borough 
  • Satisfaction with Council services and communications 
  • Satisfaction with the accessibility of the Council services
  • Feelings of social cohesion and safety 
  • Feelings of loneliness and isolation 
  • Awareness of Local Government Reorganisation (LGR) 

Methodology

A total of 10,000 randomly selected households across the borough received a postal invitation to take part in the survey, either online or by post. A target sample size of 780 was selected so that we could have confidence that views were representative of the borough’s population (at a 95% confidence level).

The survey was also made available to residents more generally, including promotion through social media, online advertising, posters, paper questionnaires in community centres, and emails to subscribers and partners. A prize draw incentive was offered.  

In total, the survey received 820 responses from residents aged 18 and over, with a margin of error of ±3.4% at a 95% confidence level.

The final sample achieved a good level of demographic representation. Weighting was used in order to make the results more representative of the demographic make-up of the borough using the Office for National Statistics (ONS) population estimates (Weighting adjusts survey results so they better reflect the whole population. If certain groups, such as younger residents, respond less, their answers are given more weight to match their actual share of the community. Weighting ensures the findings represent Reigate & Banstead residents overall, not just those who responded). This was done separately across genders and prioritised balancing age groups while also maintaining accuracy of the data.

Headline results

  • Overall satisfaction with local area – 74% 
  • Overall satisfaction with Reigate and Banstead Borough Council – 59% 
  • Waste, recycling, and street cleaning services were among the highest-rated, with 73% satisfaction 
  • Perception of safety – around 85% feel safe during the day and 56% during the night

For a detailed question-by-question findings, please see the summary below. For a full breakdown of results, please refer to the Power BI dashboard. 

Interactive dashboard

Owing to the rounding of numbers, percentages displayed within this report may not always add up to 100% and may differ slightly when compared with the Power BI dashboard. 

Satisfaction with local area

Overall satisfaction

Respondents were asked to indicate their overall satisfaction with life in their local area. 74% of residents were satisfied with life in their local area (24% very satisfied, 50% fairly satisfied). 13% were dissatisfied, while 12% remained neutral).  The satisfaction score has improved by 6 points compared to the 2025 residents’ survey. 

Life satisfaction 

Respondents were asked to indicate their satisfaction with specific aspects of life in their local area. Satisfaction levels varied across different aspects. Education received the highest satisfaction at 59%, followed by wellbeing (physical and mental health) at 38%, and local economy at 35%. Roads and public Transport along with affordability were rated less positively, with nearly half of respondents dissatisfied. Activities for young people and support for older people received mixed feedback, with between 31% and 36% respectively dissatisfied.   

Satisfaction with Reigate & Banstead Borough Council 

Overall satisfaction

Respondents were asked to indicate their overall satisfaction with the council. 59% of residents were satisfied with the council, while 22% were neutral and 19% dissatisfied.

Satisfaction with council services

Respondents were asked to indicate their satisfaction with specific council services:

  • Waste, recycling, and street cleaning services were among the highest-rated, with 73% satisfaction
  • Parks and greenspaces managed by the council also performed well at 69% followed by sports and leisure at 56%
  • The satisfaction score for community events and council operated car parks remained consistent with the previous year’s scores at around 40%
  • Housing and support for businesses and town centres received satisfaction levels of around one-third
  • Benefits and financial support were rated less positively with the satisfaction score being at 25%

Perceptions of the council

Respondents were asked to indicate the extent to which the council acts on the concerns of residents. 42% of respondents said the council is responsive to local concerns, while another 43% reported not very much or no responsiveness.

When asked how they speak about the council, 36% said they speak positively with or without being asked, and 23% said they speak negatively.

30% felt that the council provides value for money. 38% believed the council operates in an environmentally responsible way, with a large proportion remaining neutral. 

Communications

Respondents were asked to indicate the communication channel that they had used to contact the council (if they had been in contact within the previous six months). 40% of respondents had not contacted the council in the past six months.

Among those who had contacted, 48% rated the ease of finding communication channels as good or great and 52% rated the use of communication channels as good or great.

54% gave similar ratings for customer service.

55% felt fairly or very well informed about council services and benefits. 

Cohesion and safety

Residents were asked to respond to a series of statements to indicate their sense of belonging to their local area. 63% of residents felt they belong to their local area, 60% believed people from different backgrounds treat each other with respect and 50% felt that people in the local area pull together to improve the local area.

Respondents were also asked to indicate how safe they felt when outside in their local area and local town centre, both during the day and at night. During daylight hours, 83% of residents felt safe in their local area and 86% in town centres. At night, these figures dropped to 54% and 57% respectively.

When asked to indicate the extent to which different anti-social behaviours were a problem in their community, rubbish and litter lying around was identified as the most common issue, with 43% of respondents saying it was either a very big problem (14%) or a fairly big problem (29%). People using or dealing drugs was the next most reported issue, with 28% saying it was a very big problem (10%) or a fairly big problem (18%). Noisy neighbours or loud parties were the least reported issue, with 10% saying it was a problem. 

Loneliness and isolation 

Respondents were asked to respond to a series of statements to indicate feelings of isolation and loneliness.

More than three-quarters (76%) said they spoke with or spent time with friends, family or neighbours daily or at least a few times a week. Only 10% reported often or always lacking companionship, compared with 65% who said they rarely or never felt this way. Similarly, around 70% said they rarely or never felt isolated from others, and a comparable proportion said they rarely or never felt left out. 

 The result by age shows that around 15% of over-65s in report low or no social contact. This rises to 22% among 18–30-year-olds and 27% among those aged 31–64, suggesting that younger age groups are experiencing higher levels of social disconnection than might be expected. 

Local Government Reorganisation 

Respondents were asked about their awareness of Local Government Reorganisation (LGR) and how they would prefer to receive future communications about it. Overall, most residents reported at least some awareness of LGR, with 28% saying they were fully aware and a further 48% somewhat aware.

Email was the most preferred channel for future communications about LGR, selected by 34% of respondents, followed by the RBBC website (25%) and social media (16%). 

Satisfaction with accessibility of council services 

An optional question this year asked respondents to comment on the accessibility of selected council services.

Based on 308 responses, satisfaction levels varied across services. Parks, greenspaces and allotments recorded the highest proportion of satisfaction overall, with half of respondents (50%) saying they were very or fairly satisfied.

Community centres and leisure facilities (45% satisfied), together with the Council’s online services (43% satisfied), also recorded higher levels of satisfaction than dissatisfaction. 

Responses relating to public toilets and town centre pavements, crossings and pathways showed lower levels of satisfaction (20%) and higher levels of dissatisfaction (57%).

Views on Council-operated car parks were more evenly balanced, with similar proportions of respondents expressing satisfaction and dissatisfaction, while around a quarter selected neither satisfied nor dissatisfied. 

Free-text comments 

The survey received 1,429 comments from residents across different questions.

Views on council services

Summary points from comments included:

  1. More car park provision needed. Demand for more blue badge parking and stricter enforcement, complaints regarding ticket machines not being user friendly for older and disabled residents
  2. Most of the parks have been praised for good maintenance, sentiment that Redhill and Horley parks are ignored
  3. Demand for more affordable activities and events in sports and leisure, more community events
  4. Demand for affordable housing, overdevelopment of housing without adequate supporting infrastructure
  5. Excellent waste collection, need for more recycling facilities and street cleaning

Value for money

Summary points from comments included:

  1. High Council Tax compared to the services received
  2. Welfare support seen as insufficient, slow, and hard to access, with gaps for vulnerable groups and visible homelessness
  3. High living costs
  4. Potholes, poor condition of roads and inadequate public transport

Town centre and local area

Summary points from comments included:

  1. Town centres in decline, lack of variety of shops and entertainment
  2. Sports and leisure services improvements sought, particularly arts and culture
  3. More activities for youth
  4. More frequent street cleaning, litter and opportunity of volunteers
  5. Safety concerns linked to perceptions about certain groups especially in Horley and Redhill

Accessibility of council services

Summary points from comments included:

  1. More blue badge parking near public facilities like parks
  2. More accessible public toilets
  3. Uneven pavements and barriers due to car parking on pavement
  4. Requirement for direct communication through email, inaccessible website
  5. Demand for more accessible facilities within parks

General comments about the council

Summary points from comments included:

  1. Opposition to local government reorganisation, with fears of reduced local representation, inheriting other councils’ debt, and calls for the council to resist changes
  2. Desire for more proactive and more consistent communication from the council
  3. Perception of uneven investment across the borough, with some areas favoured over others

Further information 

More detailed results are available as an interactive powerbi dashboard:

Interactive dashboard

If you need any help interpreting these resources or have any questions about future resident research, then please email: engagement@reigate-banstead.gov.uk